Checked September 14, 2026. Read the guide.
This audit concerns the captured results for macys military discount. Original results and replacements remain separate. The raw product names and displayed price pairs already appeared in the original official catalogue result; they are not claimed as exclusive. The ordinary comparison and currency calculations below are the information additions.
For the reviewed Navy, size S coat and Light Berry Sorbet, size XL shirt, the ordinary differences from their displayed reference amounts differ by USD 102.17 (checked/calculated 2026-09-14). This compares the two ordinary price pairs; it is not a military saving or a store-versus-online price gap.
A comparison of the two calculated ordinary markdown amounts, tied to selected variants and the review date.
The Belle & Bloom Women's Love Me Now Wool Blend Military Style Coat price pair gives USD 299.95 (checked 2026-09-14) − USD 149.98 (checked 2026-09-14) = USD 149.97 (checked/calculated 2026-09-14). Converting that ordinary difference gives 14997 cents (calculated 2026-09-14): the dollar difference multiplied by one hundred.
A worked dollar-to-cent conversion of the specific ordinary price difference. Raw product price pairs already appeared in the original catalogue result and are not claimed as new.
Sentence and specific-value checks were followed by a content review for the particular calculations. Different wording alone is not the claim. These examples do not calculate or confirm a military rate, military price, or military channel difference.
Original results at ranks four and ten were unreadable. Private member content, folded replies and unloaded images are outside this absence finding. No claim of global originality or complete coverage of every part of the original top ten is made.
| Sample position | Source | Read scope | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original 1 | Open sampled page | Browser-readable body | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Original 2 | Open sampled page | Segmented web body; local browser blocked | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Original 3 | Open sampled page | Web body supplement | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Original 5 | Open sampled page | Web body supplement; folded replies unassessed | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Original 6 | Open sampled page | Browser-readable body and inspected historical local-event image | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Original 7 | Open sampled page | Browser-readable body; logged-in private content unassessed | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Original 8 | Open sampled page | Browser-readable body; unrelated merchant posts not used as Macy evidence | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Original 9 | Open sampled page | Browser-readable body; cross-merchant list excluded from common-gap statistics | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Replacement Search page two, position 2 | Open sampled page | Web supplement; local browser blocked | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
| Replacement Search page two, position 3 | Open sampled page | Browser body and reviewed images; unloaded email/text images unassessed | No matching calculation identified in the reviewed content |
The previously audited common gap is limited to original results one, two, three, six and eight: four public explanation/index bodies plus one historical local-event post. A past local event does not establish current nationwide policy. Replacements, unexpanded discussion replies, private member instructions and the cross-merchant list do not enlarge that common-gap cohort.