Peacock information-addition review
Audit date: 2026-09-15. The benchmark is the frozen original top-ten sample and disclosed supplements, not the entire web. Original positions 1, 2, 3 and 5 form the four-page common-gap cohort: two Peacock official pages, a verification-service introduction and an outside deal introduction. They are not four independent official confirmations.
Official positions 1 and 3 were read through public web-text retrieval after local region notices. Position 2 is judged as an introduction, without importing merchant steps. Position 5 contains old retail-reference and mixed occupational wording, not current official proof. Incomplete discussions, paid consultations, a multi-service list and failed pages are excluded from common counting.
| Candidate sentence or resource | Supported addition and limit |
|---|---|
| The resource separates code validity, access duration and renewal verification. | An assembled comparison is the addition; each underlying time condition already appears in official content and is not an exclusive fact. |
| The code is single-use, while continued qualified renewal is separately allowed. | A scope clarification drawn from official terms, not exclusive wording or a new policy. |
| Download the official six-field CSV with source locations and unconfirmed fields. | A downloadable resource addition against the fully audited common-gap cohort, not a global absence claim. |
Original position 10 already contains monthly savings, annual accumulated savings and percentage calculations. No claim is made that all competitors lack conversion examples, and ordinary annual arithmetic is not called exclusive. Supplements stay outside original counts; empty pages and a platform's lack of awareness do not deny the official offer.